In order to be successful, the most
important aspect is having a true sense of self and acknowledging your personal
biases. For this I’m going to recount some of my own perceptual filters and how
they affect my reality. It is an example of why I will see the world
differently than every other person in this room. I grew up in a home with
divorced parents, one of whom revealed he was in fact gay when I was 9 years
old. I grew up in the Catholic Church and then denounced it when my priest told
me at age 11 that I was a bastard child who would never find Heaven. I’ve been
in situations of sexual and physical violence and experienced episodes of major
depression. But even with those factors, I have a wonderful set of friends and
family who encourage me in everything that I do. Can you see how my perceptual
filters would cause me to see the world differently than other people? I
encourage you to think about what some of your perceptual filters are because
understanding what affects your interpretation skills will help you look past
your personal biases, see situations from multiple perspectives, and embrace post
formal thinking. Next time you find yourself getting angry or vehemently in
support or against something, I urge you to reflect on what experiences and
conditions have led you to that response and consider what perceptual filters
people who might disagree with you might have. Considering the perceptual
filters of others is what will truly lead to a sense of harmony in your life,
so let’s move on to dyadic communication.
The
first step to applying this concept is through dyadic communication, or
communication between two parties. Remember, everyone has their own reality and
it will inevitably be different than yours. When someone expresses a sentiment
that you disagree with, remember there is a reason that they think that way.
Their reason is dictated in the same fashion yours was: through their
individual experiences. For example, if you recall from my above example, I had
a gay father and I have denounced my religion. As a result, I am very
passionate about gay rights: a hugely controversial subject in society right
now. I also know people who are vehemently opposed to the idea of two men or
two women being married. I will never agree with them because I interpret not
only their Bible, but my moral compass in a different fashion than they do, but
I do have the ability to consider why they might think the way they do. What
could influence them to believe that gay marriage should not happen?
·
How they personally interpret the Bible
·
Fear of Rejection by important parts of their
life
·
External influences:
o
Church
o
Family Beliefs
o
Beliefs of Friends
We must remember that people are a
product of their surroundings. Their biases are learned and they were not born
with them. We must understand that getting angry at someone for their beliefs
is not productive. Instead try to utilize empathy and see the situation from
their perspective. In some cases, you might see the situation in an entirely
new light and learn something from the experience. Approach every interaction
you have with an open mind and the results could surprise you. Our goal should
be a healthy understanding of one another in order to cultivate respect. When
this mutual respect and understanding can be achieved on both sides, both
parties can universally walk away better than when they first encountered.
Now, we can move on to the
organization. Your committee, chapter, section, region, and the national
organization as a whole are all dyadic communication on a larger scale. There
will always be disagreement as to what is best for the organization going
forward. Make it a goal to check your filters when approaching a problem and consider
the filters of others. Acknowledge why you think the way you do before engaging
in an argument. Be empathetic and listen to why others feel the way they do.
This will lead to a decline in tension. This decline in tension will often lead
to you being a happier individual as well as the individuals surrounding you to
be happier. Approaching things in this way creates the highest probability that
a solution that is acceptable to everyone is met. When the organization as a
whole is happier, the issue of retention lessens and the need for risk
management virtually ceases to exist because the group is functioning
harmoniously.